Re: [PATCH 1/6] maintenance: add get_random_minute()
- From
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
- Date
- Aug 9, 2023, 12:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <a1e7d730-e220-48ec-8393-2d3538b80163@github.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZNKfxOWJAuJ5DxAN@nand.local>
On 8/8/2023 4:04 PM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 01:28:50PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
>> I see you're moving ahead with removing the srand() from the lockfile code,
> That thread may have progressed a little since you last looked at it.
I think this part of my summary is still correct.
>> so I'll focus on creating a `git_rand()` that centralizes the use of >> srand(), but won't touch the code in the lockfile so your patch applies >> independently.
> Instead of using srand() and rand() (which would make sense to wrap with > git_rand() as you propose), we can simplify our lives by using a CSPRNG, > which only gets initialized once, as is already the case with > csprng_bytes().
So the idea is to use csprng_bytes() everywhere instead of srand()/rand().
I can adjust my local patch to still create git_rand(), but base it on csprng_bytes() and not collide with your patch. Mimicking rand()'s behavior is a simpler interface to consume.
Thanks, -Stolee