git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] t9101: Refactor test_expect_success format

From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date
Nov 1, 2024, 14:42 UTC
Message-ID
<ZyTo1lQaEVvZ1Eor@nand.local>
In-Reply-To
<CAGedMteyi0_C4PhfCXcD5gHe38px_g4hbxuG63o8tCSHdLcfGg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 08:51:11AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 21:15, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:45:53AM +0100, Seyi Kuforiji wrote:
> > > The current script uses an outdated formatting style for
> > > test_expect_success blocks, where each argument is separated by a
> > > backslash and newline. This style can lead to readability issues and
> > > makes it harder to maintain the script.
> > >
> > > The modern style consolidates
> > > the multi-line command arguments into a single quoted block, which
> >
> > Strange line wrapping?
> >
>
> That error probably occurred while I was editing the message. Should I
> edit and send an updated patch?
Please do so, thanks.
Show 20 quoted lines
> > > improves readability, maintainability, and aligns the code with current
> > > coding standards.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Seyi Kuforiji <kuforiji98@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  t/t9101-git-svn-props.sh | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > This does not apply cleanly on 'master', so I assume that you wanted it
> > based on sk/t9101-cleanup. That's fine, but please let me know in the
> > future in case it's every less obvious :-).
> >
> > The changes themselves all look quite sensible, though.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Taylor
>
> Thanks, Taylor for pointing out this issue. I have rebased my change
> onto the latest master branch and resolved the conflicts for future
> updates.

There is no specific need to rebase on top of current 'master' unless failing to do so will cause the maintainer to see a conflicted state when applying.

Unless told otherwise, I will apply new rounds of existing patch series onto top of their original base.

Thanks, Taylor

Previous: Seyi ChamberNext: Seyi Kuforiji
Message 4 of 6 in “t9101: Refactor test_expect_success format”
  1. t9101: Refactor test_expect_success formatSeyi Kuforiji, Oct 31, 2024
  2. Taylor BlauOct 31, 2024
  3. Seyi ChamberNov 1, 2024
  4. Taylor BlauNov 1, 2024
  5. t9101: Refactor test_expect_success formatSeyi Kuforiji, Nov 2, 2024
  6. Seyi ChamberNov 18, 2024

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.