Re: Re* using tree as attribute source is slow, was Re: Help troubleshoot performance regression cloning with depth: git 2.44 vs git 2.42
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- May 6, 2024, 20:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Zjk9eH9e4fByGG9Z@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <20240503174653.GD3631237@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:46:53PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 08:34:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > And for folks who had been happy with the pre 2.42 behaviour, > > we could do something like the attached as the first step to a real fix. > > It looks like lots of discussion happened with out me, and everybody > already posted all of the responses I was going to. Good. :) > > In particular... > > > ----- >8 --------- >8 --------- >8 --------- >8 ----- > > Subject: [PATCH] stop using HEAD for attributes in bare repository by default > > [...] > > The right fix for this is to optimize the code paths that allow > > accesses to attributes in tree objects, but that is a much more > > involved change and is left as a longer-term project, outside the > > scope of this "first step" fix. > > ...this was the exact first step I was going to suggest. And your patch > looks correct to me. I assume you'd target this for 'maint'. The > regression goes back to v2.43.0, so it's not exactly new, but given the > severity in some cases it seems like it's worth getting it into a > release sooner rather than later.
For what it's worth, I am in favor of the patch that Junio proposed here.
Thanks, Taylor