Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] bulk-checkin: extract abstract `bulk_checkin_source`
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2023, 15:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ZTk2w6rV2y7ZKfQh@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <20231025073736.GB2145145@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 03:37:36AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> I don't mind this in-between state. It is a funny layering violating > from an OO standpoint, but it's not like we expect an unbounded set of > concrete types to "inherit" from the source struct.
Yeah, this was exactly my thinking when writing up the changes for this round. Since all of the "sub-classes" are local to the bulk-checkin.o compilation unit, I don't have grave concerns about one implementation peering into the details of another's.
Gotta stop somewhere ;-).
Thanks, Taylor