Re: [PATCH] run-command.c: need alloc.h for our own at-exit handler emulation

> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > OK, having now read both completely, I would say I have a vague
> > preference for my version since it keeps the include at the top and
> > unconditional, and has slightly more information in the patch message.
> >
> > But I do not prefer it so much over yours that I would be sad if you had
> > already queued yours and didn't want to bother shuffling it around.
>
> I do not have much preference between the two, either.  Both lack
> one important description that we are reasonably confident that this
> breakage is limited to run-command.c and no other files.