Re: Feature Request - Better i18n support

> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
> 
> > More specifically, I think it could be fixed for progress output, but
> > there are a few places in diff output where it couldn't because it might
> > be parsed.  Would you be willing to try a patch for this?  I think the
> > code you're probably thinking about is in progress.c (search for "%%"),
> > but there might be other places you have in mind as well.
> 
> Ah, my earlier grep missed this, as it tried only to catch [fdi]%%
> and the progress thing uses "%u%%" like so:
> 
> 		if (percent != progress->last_percent || progress_update) {
> 			progress->last_percent = percent;
> 
> 			strbuf_reset(counters_sb);
> 			strbuf_addf(counters_sb,
> 				    "%3u%% (%"PRIuMAX"/%"PRIuMAX")%s", percent,
> 				    (uintmax_t)n, (uintmax_t)progress->total,
> 				    tp);
> 			show_update = 1;
> 		}
> 
> With the PRIuMAX thing, it won't be as simple as enclosing the
> entire format string inside _(), though.