Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2025, #05; Fri, 17)

> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:30:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On 1/17/25 7:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> * ds/name-hash-tweaks (2024-12-20) 8 commits
> >> ...
> >> I am happy with the updated function that gives us better of both
> >> worlds, without losing too much from the "renamed from other
> >> directory" while making sure we do not lose too many bits in deeper
> >> trees.
> >
> > I had a couple of thoughts that I meant to share before the holiday
> > break, and haven't quite had a chance to get to it now that I'm back at
> > my desk.
> >
> > Let me try and find some time to respond to the latest round of this
> > series, and apologies for holding it up in the meantime.
>
> The topic has been stalled for unusually long time, so it won't hurt
> too much for it to wait for a few more days, but it wouldn't be fair
> to stall a topic further with just a promise to "try and find time"
> forever.  Let's say we'll go ahead by this weekend unless we hear
> otherwise?

> I am not ultra-happy with the last step, as I personally do not see
> this different algorithm as "version" (in that people would always
> want to use version N+1 over version N when both are available) but
> as "variant" (in that there may be prefer to use variant N over
> variant N+1 depending on the circumstances), but that may be just
> the matter of terminology.  What's important is to make sure we do
> not mix two algorhtims up while creating a packfile.