Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Bump rename limit defaults (yet again)

> > The 2008 timings are from the old email you linked in your commit
> > message, and the new one is from running the revised script you showed.
> > The savings seem like more than 30%. I don't know if that's all CPU or
> > if something changed in the code.
> 
> I was using the script you wrote in 2008, but comparing to your
> reported numbers in 2011[1].  When you bumped in 2011, you said you
> picked the limits of 400 & 1000 in order to give rough timings of 2s
> and 10s.  So the table looks more like:
> 
>    N  CPU (2008)  CPU (2011)  c5xlarge  CPU (yours)
>  400    4.87s         ~2s      1.106s      0.788s
> 1000   27.82s        ~10s      6.350s      4.431s
> 
> So, 2011->c5xlarge on these (just recomputed now numbers) show
> improvements of ~45% and ~36%.  Maybe I had an outlier run earlier
> that was in the upper 6s range for N=1000 and I rounded off to 30% for
> the commit message?  Don't know, those numbers are on a laptop that
> died in the last few days.