Re: [PATCH v2 15/20] for_each_object_in_pack(): convert to new revindex API

> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 02:33:53PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > So "pos" in this case is not wrong. But I agree that it could stand to
> > be more clear. Saying "nth" does not help things IMHO (there is an "nth"
> > pack position, as well).
> >
> > But maybe this makes it more clear (or possibly just the name change
> > without the comment):
>
> Here it is again, but with a signoff and commit message, and done on top
> of your series (so if we agree this is a good resolution, it can just be
> picked up on top, but I am also happy for it to be squashed into patch
> 15).