Re: [PATCH] adjust_shared_perm(): leave g+s alone when the group does not matter

> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
> 
> > On 2022-10-28 at 21:16:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Julien Moutinho reports that in an environment where directory does
> >> not have BSD group semantics and requires g+s (aka FORCE_DIR_SET_GID)
> >> but the system cripples chmod() to forbid g+s, adjust_shared_perm()
> >
> > I would personally use a different verb here because I have the
> > impression it's offensive, at least when used as a noun.  Perhaps
> > "limit" or "restrict" might be more neutral, or we could pick another
> > verb which expresses our displeasure at this design (maybe "impair"?)
> > but maybe is less likely to be emotionally charged or offend.
> 
> castrates? butchers?
> 
> tweaks?  That's quite neutral.