Re: [PATCH 2/3] shorten_unambiguous_ref(): use NUM_REV_PARSE_RULES constant

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > The current count-up isn't a big deal, as we need to preprocess that
> > array anyway. But it will become more cumbersome as we refactor the
> > shortening code. So let's get rid of it and just use the constant
> > everywhere.
> 
> OK.  As the array is constant, we could lose its NULL-termination
> and -1 from the definition of NUM_REV_PARSE_RULES, but that has iffy
> upside, and can come on top of the series if we really wanted to.