Re: git-stash: RFC: Adopt the default behavior to other commands

> Junio C Hamano schrieb am Mon 17. Dec, 16:31 (-0800):
> > Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> > 
> > >> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> > >>
> > >>> ...  The current behavior of git stash is very
> > >>> dangerous ...
> > > ...
> > >> This is a plain FUD, isn't it?  The first Oops should not happen 
> > >> these days.
> > 
> > But the original point by Sebastian hasn't been answered.  He wanted 
> > to make the command list the stash without arguments.
> > 
> > This was discussed already in the early days of stash and there indeed 
> > was a suggestion to do so (I think I sided with that), but the users 
> > did not want it.  IIRC, the argument went like: "when I say 'stash', 
> > that is because I want a quick and immediate way to stash, and I do 
> > not want a list.  If I do not have to have a quick way, I would create 
> > a temporary commit on the current branch, or switch to a temporary 
> > branch and commit there."
> 
> When it should go quick why don't use an alias. git stash can print the 
> list and everyone who wants a quick stash can create an alias for this.
> 
> I vote for stash print the list, because I dropped in the pitfall.