Re: git-stash: RFC: Adopt the default behavior to other commands

> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> 
> >> Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> >>
> >>> ...  The current behavior of git stash is very
> >>> dangerous ...
> > ...
> >> This is a plain FUD, isn't it?  The first Oops should not happen these
> >> days.
> 
> But the original point by Sebastian hasn't been answered.  He wanted to
> make the command list the stash without arguments.
> 
> This was discussed already in the early days of stash and there indeed
> was a suggestion to do so (I think I sided with that), but the users did
> not want it.  IIRC, the argument went like: "when I say 'stash', that is
> because I want a quick and immediate way to stash, and I do not want a
> list.  If I do not have to have a quick way, I would create a temporary
> commit on the current branch, or switch to a temporary branch and commit
> there."