Re: git-stash: RFC: Adopt the default behavior to other commands

From: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Date: Dec 19, 2007, 07:33 UTC
Message-ID: <38C1471E-0927-4B43-AF73-70735820F8F9@wincent.com>
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90712181541x781c3ebcq6d85b88dbf5cbe23@mail.gmail.com>

El 19/12/2007, a las 0:41, Martin Langhoff escribió:

Show 7 quoted lines

> On Dec 19, 2007 4:42 AM, Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> wrote:
>> I vote for stash print the list, because I dropped in the pitfall.
>
> I've dropped there myself, and work with a large team where we are
> both fans of stash, and scarred by it. Any newcomer to git that
> "discovers" stash gets hit by it a dozen times, this is completely
> unnecesary.

I may be missing something here, but what's the danger here? An unexpected stash is incredibly easy to revert, unless I'm missing something. And nobody commented on the idea I posted earlier which seems to address the concerns about newbies not knowing what "git stash" with no params does:

http://marc.info/?l=git&m=119799257404542&w=2

Cheers, Wincent