Re: [PATCH] git-stash: Display help message if git-stash is run without sub-commands
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2007, 11:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301149110.27959@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <e66701d40711300016v15700deft3d262d75a9055aca@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Kevin Leung wrote:
> The current git-stash behaviour is very error prone to typos. For > example, if you typed "git-stash llist", git-stash would thought that > you wanted to save to a stash named "llist", but in fact, you meant > "git-stash list".
I am fine with your patch. I would be equally fine with "git stash" still choosing a default message and stashing.
And yes, I agree that the "git stash <whatever>" might be a little too error-prone.
Ciao, Dscho