Re: [PATCH] git-stash: Display help message if git-stash is run without sub-commands

From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Date: Nov 30, 2007, 20:11 UTC
Message-ID: <85mysvwl25.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
In-Reply-To: <7vr6i7qz6b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

Show 11 quoted lines

> "Kevin Leung" <kevinlsk@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Nov 30, 2007 4:41 PM, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
>>> Still, 'git stash' alone should *do* the stash.
>>>
>>
>> How about `git stash' still does the stash, and `git stash llist'
>> exits with usage message? And if you want to save the stash with name,
>> you can only do it with `git stash save name_of_stash'.
>
> Sounds like a sensible thing to do.

Instead of "save", one could use "stash" since that is what it is supposed to do. Then

git stash stash stash

would create a stash called "stash".

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum