Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
> > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> >
> >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Sergei Organov wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, and that's the problem. Why 'git --continue' didn't just skip this 
> >>> patch that *already became no-op* after conflict resolution and forced 
> >>> me to explicitly use 'git --skip' instead?
> >>
> >> Isn't that obvious?  To prevent you from accidentally losing a commit.
> >
> > In case it is not obvious...
> >
> > A rebase conflict resolution that results in emptiness is a
> > rather rare event (especially because rebase drops upfront the
> > identical changes from the set of commits to be replayed), but
> > it does happen.
> 
> Funny how 2 of my first 3 commits suffer from this "rather rare event",
> and it was not Friday, 13 ;)