Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.
- From
Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2007, 22:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4728FC5C.30709@midwinter.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071031212923.GL4569@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> I ran into the same confusion as the original poster when starting to > use rebase, so I suspect it's common. >
I've been using rebase just about every day for close to a year and it *still* annoys me when it happens. Especially the "Did you forget to git add?" part of the message. The thought that always goes through my head is, "No, Mr. Rebase, I did NOT forget to git add. I remembered to git add, then you were too stupid to do the right thing after that."
Just happened to me this morning, in fact: I had a quick hack in place to work around a bug, the bug got fixed for real, and I rebased. In the process of conflict resolution I saw that my workaround wasn't needed any more and accepted the upstream version of that particular part of the file. Ran git-add on it, then rebase --continue, and boom, was accused of forgetting to run git-add.
It is a minor annoyance and nowadays I just sigh a bit and run --skip instead, but it'd be nice if it didn't happen. I don't like having to care whether or not I happened to change other files in a particular commit after I resolve conflicts in one file in favor of the upstream version.
-Steve