Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 19, 2007, 11:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707191213300.14781@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <200707191148.46228.andyparkins@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Thursday 2007 July 19, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Andy Parkins wrote: > > > > > Would porcelain.editor be a better name for this variable? > > > > From my point of view you can put into "myWonderfulGit.editor". It > > does not matter. > > By that argument, why do we bother with subsections at all. In fact why > not call the variable "xhxhxjjjll.yqlaoospsp"?
No. I said, and I quote here, "From my point of view".
Show 9 quoted lines
> They are meant to help the human remembering it. > > > So why not just leave it in "core", also because -- strictly speaking > > -- > > That's what I said for pager - since it's already there. However, since > the editor isn't already in, it's not a question of _leaving_ it > anywhere. Better that it goes in the right place when it is first > introduced.
And how would having "core.pager" but "porcelain.editor" be easier to remember? Nah, not really.
Ciao, Dscho