Re: [PATCH] send-pack --keep: do not explode into loose objects on the receiving end.
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2006, 01:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610292027160.11384@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061029075638.GB3847@spearce.org>
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote: > > This adds "keep-pack" extension to send-pack vs receive pack protocol, > > and makes the receiver invoke "index-pack --stdin --fix-thin". > > I'm torn on this. I see that keeping a pack vs. exploding to loose > objects is a local repository decision and thus should be determined > by the receiving repository, not the sending one.
I second this. I think it is really not the remote end's business to decide what the local storage policy is, and vice versa.