Re: fetching packs and storing them as packs
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Oct 29, 2006, 05:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061029052146.GA3847@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v3b9766rc.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> >> Then we can make "pack-objects --unpacked" to pretend the ones
> >> with corresponding .volatile as if the objects in them are
> >> loose, without breaking backward compatibility.
> >
> > Currently I'm changing --unpacked= to match without needing quoting.
> > I'm allowing it to match an exact pack name or if it starts with
> > "pack-" and matches the last 50 ("pack-X{40}.pack") of the pack name.
>
> I think is a very sane thing to do (I should have done that from
> the beginning). I do not like "the last 50", but I do not have
> objection to make it take either full path or just the filename
> under objects/pack/ (so not "the last 50" but "filename w/o
> slash").OK. I coded it with the last 50 but will rewrite that commit without as the code is slightly shorter that way. :-)