Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git wiki
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Date
- May 3, 2006, 22:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605031505390.4086@g5.osdl.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy7xibzbj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > > Even if I think the git mailing list itself is very responsive, I think > > the hg people were just more directly and actively involved. For git, they > > had to come to us. > > That is _very_ unfair to me. It is not like git and hg both > submitted proposals to be chosen by them and then we dropped the > ball by not supporting them properly. They have to come to us.
Oh, sorry, I didn't mean it in that way. Of _course_ they should have come to us with their issues.
So I don't think git was doing anything wrong there, I was just stating it as a neutral fact, rather than any criticism - the hg people were involved (and I think they were pushing it), and the git people weren't, because they never came to us.
Not a big deal. I actually think we'll be better off with some competition to keep us on our toes.
Linus