git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git wiki

From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date
May 3, 2006, 20:58 UTC
Message-ID
<7vy7xibzbj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0605030817580.4086@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Which brings me to the final point, which is that I think the hg team was 
> very active and supporting, perhaps Matt himself. That's _important_ - the 
> OpenSolaris people probably felt very comfortable with strong support from 
> the developers. It can often be _the_ best (and biggest) reason to choose 
> any product - regardless of anything else.

I agree with this 100%. I happened to be talking with Eric about the clone breakage he was having on #git channel, and I asked him to help me diagnose the problem, which resulted in the solution we saw on the list. It turned out to be the same "1.2.2 works but 1.2.4 not" problem OpenSolaris evaluator was having. I was never contacted from somebody in the OpenSolaris circle during the whole exercise.

But reading their Mercurial report apparently suggests that their hg evaluator was with direct contact with the right community from early on. I still do not even know (I've seen it once in _their_ report) who the git evaluator on their end was. I am not surprised that the difference in depth of involvements and contact between the development community and the respective evaluator contributed to the result in a major way.

> Even if I think the git mailing list itself is very responsive, I think 
> the hg people were just more directly and actively involved. For git, they 
> had to come to us.

That is _very_ unfair to me. It is not like git and hg both submitted proposals to be chosen by them and then we dropped the ball by not supporting them properly. They have to come to us.

The time I personally became aware about their DSCM selection contest was when its initial phase was almost over; even if I were willing to help them, it was too late. And no, I do not have enough time to go fishing for such opportunities everywhere to help many random projects, either.

Previous: seanNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 32 of 37 in “[ANNOUNCE] Git wiki”
  1. Petr BaudisMay 2, 2006
  2. Junio C HamanoMay 2, 2006
  3. Paolo CiarrocchiMay 3, 2006
  4. Petr BaudisMay 3, 2006
  5. Paolo CiarrocchiMay 3, 2006
  6. Nicolas PitreMay 3, 2006
  7. Shawn PearceMay 3, 2006
  8. Andreas EricssonMay 3, 2006
  9. Paolo CiarrocchiMay 3, 2006
  10. Jakub NarebskiMay 3, 2006
  11. Linus TorvaldsMay 3, 2006
  12. Paolo CiarrocchiMay 3, 2006
  13. Linus TorvaldsMay 3, 2006
  14. Jakub NarebskiMay 3, 2006
  15. Paolo CiarrocchiMay 3, 2006
  16. Jakub NarebskiMay 3, 2006
  17. David LangMay 3, 2006
  18. Petr BaudisMay 3, 2006
  19. David LangMay 3, 2006
  20. Petr BaudisMay 3, 2006
  21. Daniel BarkalowMay 4, 2006
  22. Theodore TsoMay 3, 2006
  23. Linus TorvaldsMay 3, 2006
  24. Theodore TsoMay 3, 2006
  25. Linus TorvaldsMay 3, 2006
  26. Sam RavnborgMay 3, 2006
  27. Petr BaudisMay 3, 2006
  28. Joel BeckerMay 3, 2006
  29. Petr BaudisMay 3, 2006
  30. Daniel BarkalowMay 3, 2006
  31. seanMay 3, 2006
  32. Junio C HamanoMay 3, 2006
  33. Junio C HamanoMay 3, 2006
  34. Linus TorvaldsMay 3, 2006
  35. [ANNOUNCE] Revamped Git homepagePetr Baudis, May 4, 2006
  36. Jakub NarebskiMay 4, 2006
  37. Petr BaudisMay 4, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.