Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git wiki

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 3 May 2006, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>>
>>>On 5/3/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dear diary, on Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:39:07AM CEST, I got a letter
>>>>where Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com> said that...
>>>>
>>>>>On 5/3/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>BTW, do you know why GIT has not been selected as SCM for OpenSolaris?
>>>>>(they choose Mercurial).
>>>>
>>>>I think it's explained somewhere in their forums (or mailing lists or
>>>>whatever they actually _are_).
>>>
>>>I only found the announcement, not the rationales.
>>
>>http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.html
>>
>>Looks like they didn't buy the argument about the uselessness of 
>>recording file renames.
> 
> 
> The final evaluations are available from here (at the very bottom
> of the page):
> 
>   http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/
> 
> It looks like Mercurial doesn't support renames either, but a lot
> of users are asking for it to be supported.  So I don't think that's
> the reason.  It looks more like they didn't enjoy porting GIT 1.2.2
> (as 1.2.4 was found to not work in all cases) to Solaris and the
> tester ran into some problems with the conflict resolution support.
> 
> My own reading of the two final evaluations for GIT and Mercurial
> leaves me feeling like GIT is a more mature tool which is faster
> and more stable then Mercurial.  GIT seemed to be more reliable
> during testing then Mercurial was, despite the cloning issue.
> Which makes me surprised that OpenSolaris selected Mercurial instead.
>