Re: [PATCH v3 13/15] ref-filter: introduce remote_ref_atom_parser()
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Jan 26, 2016, 00:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cTLxhrh3d0ouGLGq+ke8mzFKqCz0ABAECSA4vS+=epv9Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1451980994-26865-14-git-send-email-Karthik.188@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 46 quoted lines
> Introduce remote_ref_atom_parser() which will parse the '%(upstream)'
> and '%(push)' atoms and store information into the 'used_atom'
> structure based on the modifiers used along with the corresponding
> atom.
>
> Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <Karthik.188@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -841,6 +863,43 @@ static inline char *copy_advance(char *dst, const char *src)
> +static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom *atom, const char *refname,
> + struct branch *branch, const char **s)
> +{
> + int num_ours, num_theirs;
> + if (atom->u.remote_ref == RR_SHORTEN)
> + *s = shorten_unambiguous_ref(refname, warn_ambiguous_refs);
> + else if (atom->u.remote_ref == RR_TRACK) {
> + if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours,
> + &num_theirs, NULL))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!num_ours && !num_theirs)
> + *s = "";
> + else if (!num_ours)
> + *s = xstrfmt("[behind %d]", num_theirs);
> + else if (!num_theirs)
> + *s = xstrfmt("[ahead %d]", num_ours);
> + else
> + *s = xstrfmt("[ahead %d, behind %d]",
> + num_ours, num_theirs);
> + } else if (atom->u.remote_ref == RR_TRACKSHORT) {
> + if (stat_tracking_info(branch, &num_ours,
> + &num_theirs, NULL))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!num_ours && !num_theirs)
> + *s = "=";
> + else if (!num_ours)
> + *s = "<";
> + else if (!num_theirs)
> + *s = ">";
> + else
> + *s = "<>";
> + } else if (atom->u.remote_ref == RR_NORMAL)
> + *s = refname;I think I mentioned this in a previous review: If the code falls past this final 'else if' for some reason (programmer error), then *s won't get assigned at all, which is probably undesirable. To protect against such a case, you might want either to add a final 'else':
else
die("BUG: ...");or just consider RR_NORMAL the catchall case, and turn the final 'else if' into a plain 'else':
else /* RR_NORMAL */
*s = refname;Show 7 quoted lines
> +} > @@ -894,6 +953,8 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref) > refname = branch_get_upstream(branch, NULL); > if (!refname) > continue; > + fill_remote_ref_details(atom, refname, branch, &v->s); > + continue;
There are now two 'continue' statements very close together here. Have you considered this instead?
if (refname)
fill_remote_ref_details(...);
continue;It might make the code a bit more straightforward. (Genuine question; I don't feel too strongly about it.)
Show 9 quoted lines
> } else if (starts_with(name, "push")) {
> const char *branch_name;
> if (!skip_prefix(ref->refname, "refs/heads/",
> @@ -904,6 +965,8 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
> refname = branch_get_push(branch, NULL);
> if (!refname)
> continue;
> + fill_remote_ref_details(atom, refname, branch, &v->s);
> + continue;Ditto.
> } else if (starts_with(name, "color:")) {
> v->s = atom->u.color;
> continue;