Re: [PATCH 0/3] t3404 incremental improvements
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Aug 22, 2013, 18:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cRM_j7KOKG+YS1aTqz7suDY5LC7kh5-oP5H-GAenUqq-w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqk3jesk2a.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes: > >> This set of patches was meant to be a re-roll of [1] addressing Junio's >> comments, however [1] graduated to 'next' before I found time to work on >> it further, so these are instead incremental patches atop 'next'. > > Just FYI, 'next' will be rewound once the upcoming release is done, > so we have a chance to rewind and squash.
How would we go about this? Is there something I can do to streamline the squashing?
Unfortunately, the various fix-up patches do not have a one-to-one correspondence to the original three patches in 'next'.