From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:17:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] t3404 incremental improvements
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRM_j7KOKG+YS1aTqz7suDY5LC7kh5-oP5H-GAenUqq-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqk3jesk2a.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>
>> This set of patches was meant to be a re-roll of [1] addressing Junio's
>> comments, however [1] graduated to 'next' before I found time to work on
>> it further, so these are instead incremental patches atop 'next'.
>
> Just FYI, 'next' will be rewound once the upcoming release is done,
> so we have a chance to rewind and squash.

How would we go about this? Is there something I can do to streamline
the squashing?

Unfortunately, the various fix-up patches do not have a one-to-one
correspondence to the original three patches in 'next'.