Re: [PATCH] builtin/receive-pack: avoid generic function name hmac
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- May 5, 2020, 05:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cRE60kw-PeF=Di7O9Kw1P1CctCX0drDzGX3diVQ2-Fu1Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200505054630.5821-1-carenas@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:46 AM Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> [...] > While the conflict, posses the question of why are we even implementing our > own RFC 2104 complaint HMAC while alternatives are readily available, the > simplest solution is to make sure the name is not as generic so it would > conflict with an equivalent one from the system (or linked libraries); so > rename it again to hmac_hash to reflect it will use the git's defined hash > function. > ---
Missing sign-off.