Re: [PATCH 5/5] test-lib-functions: restrict test_must_fail usage
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- Jun 30, 2020, 21:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cQdqYkCW7UED+sn+P-is+tDDGtY-KConhgJZW=CCHAk9A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cSNK1MDitZyh7Ax-eRAh6NjG_QsoF0feEo4475GjZ5ezw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:03 AM Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> wrote: > > + case "$1" in *?=*) ;; *) break ;; esac > > Isn't '*?=*' the same as '?=', or am I misunderstanding the intention?
Nevermind. My brain blipped out while reading that. Obviously '?=' is not the same as '*?=*' here.
The rest of the review comments still stand (I think).