Re: propagating repo corruption across clone
- From
- Jeff Mitchell <jeffrey.mitchell@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 28, 2013, 13:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOx6V3Yx5CYGQXMY_LUy0mxpROZveYjitdAqY_hC4dRcMU9sXw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1364410309241-7580845.post@n2.nabble.com>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Rich Fromm <richard_fromm@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Nevertheless, I will try to contact Jeff and point him at this. My initial > reading of his blog posts definitely gave me the impression that this was a > --mirror vs. not issue, but it really sounds like his main problem was using > --local.
Actually, I wasn't using --local, I just wasn't using --no-local, as I mixed up that and --no-hardlinks (which lies somewhere between, but is still not the same as using file://).
It's entirely possible that you read the posts before I updated them.
Also, keep in mind, if you're evaluating what you're doing, that the system we have was not set up to be a backup system. It was set up to be a mirror system. With proper sanity checking, it would have acted in a decent capacity as a backup system, but that wasn't why it was set up, nor how it was set up.