Re: [PATCH 1/2] t3200-branch: test setting branch as own upstream
- From
Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 28, 2014, 11:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAN7MxmVxYhF1VXWZNAXyfF8iBNQaqqwoyjmDAP_9_bc5NUUU6A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140228105929.GA18960@sigill.intra.peff.net>
> I just don't want to regress somebody else's workflow due > to my lack of imagination.
This makes a lot of sense to me, although as-is the function emits a warning and returns immediately (although with a successful status code), so I'm also stumped as to what kind of workflow this would be included in.
In any case, if the jury's out on this one, I suppose the two patches I submitted are good to merge? Part of me thinks the bump from warning to error belongs in its own patch anyway.
- Brian Gesiak