Re: [PATCH 12/20] remote-bzr: split marks file

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 27, 2013, 00:35 UTC
Message-ID: <CAMP44s3jw-uy_BJyWjkGEPPeEiD4A8M3ywAAbmWRn44vfvDTvQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v4nesvncw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> And in case anybody is thinking that remote-bzr is really a too fast
>> moving target; even if this managed to land in 'master', it's likely
>> that people were not able to push at all, and in fact, many were not
>> even able to clone in 1.8.2. So, hardly could be considered a
>> regression. Nevertheless, I caught it in time.
>
> You didn't.  I am already way too deep into today's 1.8.3-rc0
> integration cycle and I won't waste a couple of hours work just to
> revert this.

All right, if you already merged this patch series, you could do what I did in my public branch: revert it, it's a single command, doesn't take hours.

But I don't see this series in origin/master, am I missing something?

> But from your description it sounds like with or without the patch
> the helper is equally broken and it does not make that much of a
> difference.

Indeed. Many people would need this patch series to push, and this patch breaks the push for more than one remote. So if you merged the whole thing quite likely their situation would improve; they could at least push to one remote, instead of zero. Of course, if you remove this patch, they would be able to push to many.

But I don't see it merged.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras