Re: [PATCH 12/20] remote-bzr: split marks file
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2013, 00:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4nesvncw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s2dzV428+_ZENg_Z5n=rnvqz1ZNAxnjsqCtLSJK-9PZZg@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> And in case anybody is thinking that remote-bzr is really a too fast > moving target; even if this managed to land in 'master', it's likely > that people were not able to push at all, and in fact, many were not > even able to clone in 1.8.2. So, hardly could be considered a > regression. Nevertheless, I caught it in time.
You didn't. I am already way too deep into today's 1.8.3-rc0 integration cycle and I won't waste a couple of hours work just to revert this.
But from your description it sounds like with or without the patch the helper is equally broken and it does not make that much of a difference.