Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] remote-bzr: couple of fixes

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> So do you want to queue these on top of the "massive" in 'next', not
>>> directly on 'master'?
>>
>> If they apply on master, master. But I'm confused, are the massive
>> changes not going to graduate to master? Because if not, I should
>> cherry-pick the safest changes, as there's a lot of good stuff there.
>
> I think we discussed and agreed that we would ship it in 1.8.3 if we
> hear positive feedback from Emacs folks, and my understanding is
> that I was waiting for you to give me a go-ahead once that happens.

> It is entirely up to you to add these two on top of that "massive"
> stuff, their fate decided by feedback from Emacs folks, or apply
> these as "much safer than those we need to hear from them; we can
> verify their validity and safety ourselves without knowing the real
> world projects that use the program" patches.
>
> The impression I was getting from your response "I hear it breaks
> for some of them without the patch but I haven't seen the breakage
> myself" is that it is safer to group 2/2 as part of the rest of the
> series, but as I heard in the same message that you heard Emacs
> folks are happy with the entire series, so it wouldn't make much of
> a difference either way.
>
> Will apply these two to the tip of the "massive" stuff, and merge
> the result before the next -rc.