Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] remote-hg: fixes and cleanups

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: May 14, 2013, 20:08 UTC
Message-ID: <CAMP44s3TUNp-rzBVs=xqWyYj2kNSeHMZmaYpOgx0uott3pw8BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vzjvxie12.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 16 quoted lines

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks interested in working remote-hg, please try it out, so that we
>>> can have a polished one soon after 1.8.3 ships (I am not saying this
>>> round is not polished---I haven't even looked at the patches).
>>>
>>> And others, please spend time on testing the 1.8.3-rc2 to make sure
>>> what we are going to ship is free of embarrassing regressions.
>>
>> If we want folks to test something, it should be the patches I
>> prepared for 'next' which I just sent.
>
> Yeah, but that is for the release _after_ 1.8.3; I'd rather see
> folks help to make sure we have a solid 1.8.3 relaese.

That's the intention of the ten patches I sent for 1.8.3. But you said you are not going to put them in 'master', but in 'next', so I sent the ones I think should go into next.

So now you have the patches that I think should go into 'master' (10), and the ones for 'next' (47, including the previous unmerged 10).

-- 
Felipe Contreras