Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] remote-hg: fixes and cleanups

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: May 14, 2013, 03:34 UTC
Message-ID: <CAMP44s134n9az4anLAnNH6DLT92kAJjW3_rYUx1hGZJ6ECWAYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vfvxql66j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines

> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Since the last series is not merged to master yet, I decided to add more cleanups.
>
> Because nothing new will go to 'master' past -rc1 by default, unless
> you are working on fixing or finding 1.8.3 regressions, this is a
> good time to polish things that are meant for the next cycle.

I know, I've been polishing a bunch of patches for the next cycle for a long time.

Show 6 quoted lines

> Folks interested in working remote-hg, please try it out, so that we
> can have a polished one soon after 1.8.3 ships (I am not saying this
> round is not polished---I haven't even looked at the patches).
>
> And others, please spend time on testing the 1.8.3-rc2 to make sure
> what we are going to ship is free of embarrassing regressions.

The whole purpose of this series is to avoid regressions, that's why I sent them for 1.8.3. I thought I made it clear[1] that we would want these patches in, to avoid regressions, unless it's desirable that we end up pushing garbage to a remote repository.

Cheers.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/224224

-- 
Felipe Contreras