Re: [PATCH 2/3] completion: remove old code
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2012, 10:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s2j+qotu8Fb-1qq9bqHqt+ZF877YzZFXHiMo7Z_BGzTMA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vd3a1erwf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: > >> OK, maybe some people use it, but most likely they are using an old >> version of git, and thus an old version of the completion script. > > Please adjust your attitude about backward compatibility to match the > standard used for other parts of Git.
What attitude? I am simply stating a fact. How much percentage of people do you think still have .git/remotes around? How many people do you think have clones more than 3 years old? And how many of these people would complain if remotes were not properly completed for these repos?
I doubt anybody would have complained, but I guess we would never know, because I already proposed a solution that would work for them and only uses a *single* line of code, unlike the current 40 ones.
I don't see what is the problem with the attitude of sending a patch to remove code that most likely nobody cares about (neither you or I have numbers on this), and then finding an alternative when people do care about it.
Cheers.
-- Felipe Contreras