Re: Python extension commands in git - request for policy change
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2012, 11:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s1cG=5D9DppHmB9CpgkgdEzM72KhQ1Q-kWrrDo8ST+r_g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121125095429.GB22279@thyrsus.com>
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> wrote: >> > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>: >> >> These may apply to other languages as well. Where do we draw a line? >> > >> > I'm in favor of the general policy of avoiding scripting languages >> > other than the top three most widely deployed. At the moment that >> > means shell, Python, Perl; on present trends, in a few years Perl >> > (dropping in popularity) might be passed by Ruby on the way up. >> >> Top three according to whom? > > According to the LOC counts in git's codebase.
Not according to ohloh:
1) shell 33% 2) tcl 9% 3) perl 9.7%
4) python 1.8%
And this is a non-sequitur; you are proposing to change git policies based on numbers that are a direct result of git's policies?
https://www.ohloh.net/p/git/analyses/latest/languages_summary
-- Felipe Contreras