Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] test: tests for the "double > from mailmap" bug
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2012, 22:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s1adDHvDVCBpPGUb5YpwyLkqB8LcqjAou4b2EzJL7kmYQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120214222128.GA24544@burratino>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Now I have offered some suggestions for improving some of your > patches. Applying these suggestions would be effortless, since I sent > them in patch form. What is your response? You send a point-by-point > rebuttal explaining how each detail of my suggestions is bad, bad, > bad, and then resend the original with comparatively small changes.
That's a difference of opinion. And I didn't say the where 'bad'; I just didn't agree with them.
> Can you see how this might indicate a stronger difference of opinion > than you have mentioned? And how a reviewer might make the mistake of > thinking his comments were unwelcome after such an experience?
Your comments are welcome. My comments back are not?
-- Felipe Contreras