From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:36:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] test: tests for the "double > from mailmap" bug
Message-ID: <CAMP44s1adDHvDVCBpPGUb5YpwyLkqB8LcqjAou4b2EzJL7kmYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120214222128.GA24544@burratino>

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now I have offered some suggestions for improving some of your
> patches.  Applying these suggestions would be effortless, since I sent
> them in patch form.  What is your response?  You send a point-by-point
> rebuttal explaining how each detail of my suggestions is bad, bad,
> bad, and then resend the original with comparatively small changes.

That's a difference of opinion. And I didn't say the where 'bad'; I
just didn't agree with them.

> Can you see how this might indicate a stronger difference of opinion
> than you have mentioned?  And how a reviewer might make the mistake of
> thinking his comments were unwelcome after such an experience?

Your comments are welcome. My comments back are not?

-- 
Felipe Contreras