Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] test: tests for the "double > from mailmap" bug
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2012, 22:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120214222128.GA24544@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s1mV2cE=R49qYSLd8eZPhCpRx0hRnnG_-K3iBxp_YQEpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> The difference of opinion is that I consider the patch already good > enough (adding the comments from Junio).
Ok, I can understand where you're coming from there.
Now I have offered some suggestions for improving some of your patches. Applying these suggestions would be effortless, since I sent them in patch form. What is your response? You send a point-by-point rebuttal explaining how each detail of my suggestions is bad, bad, bad, and then resend the original with comparatively small changes.
Can you see how this might indicate a stronger difference of opinion than you have mentioned? And how a reviewer might make the mistake of thinking his comments were unwelcome after such an experience?