Re: [PATCH] build: get rid of the notion of a git library

> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> The plan is simple; make libgit.a a proper library, starting by
>> clarifying what goes into libgit.a, and what doesn't. If there's any
>> hopes of ever having a public library, it's clear what code doesn't
>> belong in libgit.a; code that is meant for builtins, that code belongs
>> in builtins/lib.a, or similar.
>>
>> Give this a try:
>>
>> --- a/sequencer.c
>> +++ b/sequencer.c
>>
>> libgit.a(sequencer.o): In function `copy_notes':
>> /home/felipec/dev/git/sequencer.c:110: undefined reference to
>> `init_copy_notes_for_rewrite'
>> /home/felipec/dev/git/sequencer.c:114: undefined reference to
>> `finish_copy_notes_for_rewrite'
>
> This is a good example: yes, I'm convinced that the code does need to
> be reorganized.  Please resend your {sequencer.c ->
> builtin/sequencer.c} patch with this example as the rationale, and
> let's work towards improving libgit.a.