Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] remote-bzr: massive changes
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 1, 2013, 18:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s0n28ihRXf4f25Sx0jkg2u-eROR93bkO0Nm6X00tmkVMA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vli7y8xia.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: > >>> So let's go ahead and apply these directly on top of 'master', once >>> we hear from Emacs folks and they are happy with it. I'll queue it >>> on 'pu' so that I do not have to go back to the list archive when it >>> happens. >> >> I already heard that everything seems to be working correctly, except >> one feature, the biggest change, which I screwed up with a one-liner >> commit. That's why I added a test. Anyway, I've fixed it in my github >> branch and in this patch series, and I've told them to try the fix. > > Let us know when they make progress on that front. > > If Emacs decides to switch to Git and decides to use this version of > remote-bzr for their conversion, or at least a nontrivial group of > developers favor to do so, without seeing concrete technical points > that say remote-bzr is not yet ready (e.g. "the conversion is still > wrong and X, Y and Z needs to be fixed"), that would be a very > welcome solid vote of confidence in favor of us going ahead with > this.
Seems unlikely for political reasons (isn't it always for GNU?), since RMS is heavily involved in the decision.
-- Felipe Contreras