Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] remote-bzr: massive changes

> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>> So let's go ahead and apply these directly on top of 'master', once
>>>> we hear from Emacs folks and they are happy with it.  I'll queue it
>>>> on 'pu' so that I do not have to go back to the list archive when it
>>>> happens.
>>>
>>> I already heard that everything seems to be working correctly, except
>>> one feature, the biggest change, which I screwed up with a one-liner
>>> commit. That's why I added a test. Anyway, I've fixed it in my github
>>> branch and in this patch series, and I've told them to try the fix.
>>
>> Let us know when they make progress on that front.
>>
>> If Emacs decides to switch to Git and decides to use this version of
>> remote-bzr for their conversion, or at least a nontrivial group of
>> developers favor to do so, without seeing concrete technical points
>> that say remote-bzr is not yet ready (e.g. "the conversion is still
>> wrong and X, Y and Z needs to be fixed"), that would be a very
>> welcome solid vote of confidence in favor of us going ahead with
>> this.
>
> Seems unlikely for political reasons (isn't it always for GNU?), since
> RMS is heavily involved in the decision.