Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] remote-bzr: massive changes

>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>>> 
>>>>> So let's go ahead and apply these directly on top of 'master', once
>>>>> we hear from Emacs folks and they are happy with it.  I'll queue it
>>>>> on 'pu' so that I do not have to go back to the list archive when it
>>>>> happens.
>>>> 
>>>> I already heard that everything seems to be working correctly, except
>>>> one feature, the biggest change, which I screwed up with a one-liner
>>>> commit. That's why I added a test. Anyway, I've fixed it in my github
>>>> branch and in this patch series, and I've told them to try the fix.
>>> 
>>> Let us know when they make progress on that front.
>>> 
>>> If Emacs decides to switch to Git and decides to use this version of
>>> remote-bzr for their conversion, or at least a nontrivial group of
>>> developers favor to do so, without seeing concrete technical points
>>> that say remote-bzr is not yet ready (e.g. "the conversion is still
>>> wrong and X, Y and Z needs to be fixed"), that would be a very
>>> welcome solid vote of confidence in favor of us going ahead with
>>> this.
>> 
>> Seems unlikely for political reasons (isn't it always for GNU?), since
>> RMS is heavily involved in the decision.