Re: [PATCH 01/18] advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 24, 2011, 10:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0mfVXTb+p_73YpxY-hhTCN-XbR9jz7iDTKK+uKiE5prkQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110722223555.GB19620@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Phil and Jeff,
Jeff King writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:35:44AM -0400, Phil Hord wrote: >> In either case, the comma after "Please" is wrong. (There are other >> messages in the git code which make this same mistake, but there are >> more which use "Please <imperative-verb>..." correctly.) > > Still, I think I find it more readable without the comma, and better > still if every spot were converted to "hint: ". This question has come > up once or twice before, too, so I don't know that a patch removing the > commas would be out of line.
Ah, I was wondering about this too. Even if a patch that goes around removing commas or "Please, " in the entire codebase isn't desirable, I can make the change in this series.
Thanks.
-- Ram