Re: [PATCH 2/4] glossary: define committish (a.k.a. commit-ish)
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2013, 10:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0mBYBeZ4cN203VP51RXW2=hwGGM=pXjLxuqXWu7R8M4yw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <51C203A1.4000404@bbn.com>
Richard Hansen wrote:
> In the meantime, I'll > rework the patch series to avoid using the word "ref" when defining > committish and tree-ish.
This is a good way forward. I'm curious about what you're planning on substituting it with though: the "extended SHA-1 expression" that Jonathan hinted at?