From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:37:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] glossary: define committish (a.k.a. commit-ish)
Message-ID: <CALkWK0mBYBeZ4cN203VP51RXW2=hwGGM=pXjLxuqXWu7R8M4yw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C203A1.4000404@bbn.com>

Richard Hansen wrote:
> In the meantime, I'll
> rework the patch series to avoid using the word "ref" when defining
> committish and tree-ish.

This is a good way forward.  I'm curious about what you're planning on
substituting it with though: the "extended SHA-1 expression" that
Jonathan hinted at?