Re: [PATCH 2/4] glossary: define committish (a.k.a. commit-ish)
- From
- Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>
- Date
- Jun 19, 2013, 04:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <51C135BE.4030506@bbn.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0mo2SG+Eh1Qmy58Xo-taG_EGEj9RSx65EYhvs2CLK9dUA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2013-06-19 00:19, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Is master~3 a committish? What about :/foomery?
Yes; as documented, both of those are refs that point to a commit.
> Look at the other forms in gitrevisions(7); master:quuxery,
> master^{tree} are notable exceptions.gitrevisions(7) says that master:quuxery is a ref pointing to a blob or tree, so it is not a committish. However, if quuxery is a submodule, I would expect master:quuxery to point to a commit object and thus be a committish. So perhaps the <rev>:<path> description in gitrevisions(7) should be updated to accommodate submodules.
master^{tree} is guaranteed to be a tree (if such a tree exists), so it is not a committish.
-Richard