Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Towards a useable git-branch
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 28, 2013, 14:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0kv-5vAMsrtpPffBaSZrHfm98KNDL8Jw6_pSLsL=8=8iA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0k=2NZsbSnxS50w+bux8q9mZh7GZzpCqhTP=2jqyHnBSg@mail.gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> %>(N) doesn't work properly with f-e-r, and I'm not sure why. I'm not > talking about your last patch where you compute * -- that works fine; > it's just that %>(N) doesn't when N is a concrete number.
Try this:
%(refname:short)%>(30)%(upstream:short)
(assuming that you have lots of branches). I'm noticing random alignment problems.
However, %<(N) doesn't seem to have this problem:
%<(30)%(refname:short)%(upstream:short)
I'm not able to figure this out.